NP, CCT 10/26/1861

From the Colorado Citizen  {Columbus, Tex.}
 
October 26, 1861
 
Hon. C. C. Herbert
   The LaGrange True Issue, of last week, pitches into the Citizen, or rather into Col. C. C. Herbert, in an article of half a column in length, and simply because the Colonel advocates a plausible and feasible plan of rendering the defences of Louisianan and Texas more efficient. That plan is the building, by the Confederate Government, of the New Orleans & Texas Railroad. The Constitution does not in any wise prohibit the construction of any work by the Government for the common defence. To say it does, would reflect seriously upon the framers of that instrument. We decline to impeach the honesty of Col. Tate, as does the Issue the honesty of Col. Herbert. We know Col. Herbert is sincere and honest in the advocacy of this railroad project; we are equally certain that Col. Tate's opposition to it is honest. We do not impugn his motives. The time for bitter invectives has passed away.
   "Fair Play," in the State Gazette, says something favorable of Col. Herbert, which we insert below. The Issue can smoke that in its pipe for awhile; after which he can kindle anew and go it on the assertion of several gentlemen from the lower counties of the District, that the "Old War Horse" would get a handsome -- an overwhelming -- majority in them! How would you like to let presses change hands on the election?
   "In the Gazette of last week, a correspondent seeks to show that Col. Herbert is advocating an unconstitutional measure. Col. Herbert, in common with almost every other citizen, is impressed with the conviction, that with our seaboard blockaded, some means of speedy transportation should exist between Texas and her sister States. A railroad connection is imperatively demanded for our security, not as an 'improvement to facilitate commerce," but as a measure of defense. The cannon intended for coast defense, and recently buried in the mud between New Orleans and Galveston, should admonish every one how much a railroad connection is needed. Not only did the Provisional Government complete the railroad to Pensacola, to facilitate the transportation of troops and munitions of war, but the Confederate Government is even now constructing eighteen miles of railroad in Virginia, leading out from Winchester for a like purpose.
   "Congress has a right to construct any improvement necessary for the defense of the people. The inhibition contained in the 8th section of the Constitution is only the appropriation of money by Congress for any internal improvement intended to facilitate commerce; but Congress is not prohibited from constructing any work in a time of war which may be necessary as a means of defense, simply because it may be used afterward, in time of peace, to facilitate commerce.
   "The argument sometimes used, that if we undertake one work as a military necessary, it will be used as a pretext for undertaking others really intended to facilitate commerce, is puerile. It is based on the idea that the representatives of the people will avail themselves of a pretext to perjure themselves."
   "One word in conclusion. Though Col. Herbert is not a lawyer, as his competitors are, he is a man of good head and clear judgment, and has been a strict constructionist all his life. The man who led the assault on the Bishop's palace at Monterey, bear-headed and in front of his company, can be trusted as one who has nerve enough to do right. That man is C. C. Herbert.
"Fair Play"

Home