NA, QMR 2/15/1864

Virginia Central Railroad
General Superintendent's Office
Richmond, Va., February 15, 1864
 
Major F. W. Sims Q. M. &c.
 
Sir,
   The Q. M. General has ordered that for all goods &c lost by the Richmond Companies the market rates for such goods at the time shall be paid.
   I do not know the date of the order, and wish to know whether he includes those goods lost previous to the date of the order. 
   We have a large amount of those claims to settle, some of which are for goods &c lost twelve months since. Major C. M. Smith thinks the recent order covers those claims. As we were ready to settle whenever called upon, and would have had to pay only cost and charges, if the accounts had been presented, I can hardly think the recent order is intended to apply to these cases.
   I trust moreover that Genl Lawton will resend his order. We do all we can to protect the Government property & so far as our road is concerned I cannot advit that the increased penalty will increase our vigilance in the same proportion {hole in paper} so if we were allowed to employ white brakesmen & watchmen for the trains, and if then our compensation was increased to something like the rates for private freights the order would not seem so hard. It would even then be more stringent than our custom with private customers who have to be satisfied with the repayment of cost and charges.
   The cost of coffee, clothing & some other articles is nearly or quite the value of silver before the war. Many other articles approximate that price but no one would have expected any R. R. Co to carry silver at such rates as we now carry these articles for the Govt. Add to this our want of power to protect, and the condition of our cars, & more than all the inducement to steal from very want and the order seems very hard. Nor will it bear equally. Corn is worth say $4 in Georgia it is worth $25 in Richmond yet we receive precisely the same compensation.
   Would it not be better for the Government, the only party having the power, to protect these trains & to assume all risks contracting with the Companies simply for the work? It seems to me a very fair proposition.
   If the order if continued I must respectfully ask for increased compensation sufficient to cover the risk. I do not hesitate to say that our losses since this order was issued will more than consmure our rceff earnings from transportation of freight and my opinion is that it would nearly absorb all the gross receipts from this source. I am sure the Q. M. Genl. does not intend this, nor can he expect that this Company can submit to the order without ??hance.
Very Respectfully
Your ovt Sevt
H. D. Whitcomb
 
{on back of letter}
Virginia Central Rail Road
Richmond Feby 16th 1864
H. D. Whitcomb Genl Supt.
Asks that claiming for loss prior to the late order charging market price for lost articles be settled according to the custom then prevailing.
Also making objections to the rule now in force and states that if it is insisted on the road must have increased rates for transportation.
 
Rail Road Bureau
Richmond Feby 16/64
Respy referred to Q. M. G. for his consideration
When the rule charging market rates acts retroactively it seems scarcely fair to enforce it. It is recommended therefore that in such cases the old rule of cost and charges be observed.
It is impolite to charge less than market rates. It would be better to allow an increased tariff. Then the Govt knows what it must expect.
The clamor raised at being held to a strict accountability is proof that Govt business has been done too loosely, and the sooner a change is made the better.
F. W. Sims
Lt. Col. & Q. M.
 
Q. M. G Feb 17, 1864
Approved and respectfully returned to Lt. Col. Sims
By order of QMGenl
W. F. Adams
Major & Asst to the QMGenl

Home