NA, RRB 1/31/1865

Jany 31st 1865
 
R. L. Singletary
Prest.   {President, Charleston & Savannah RR}
Charleston S. C.
 
Dear Sir,
   Your two favors of Dec 19th & Jany 5th are at hand and would have received earlier reply but for a protracted absence.
   Permit me to call your attention to your letter of Nov 29th in which you state that "several other roads, some of which do not labor under the disadvantages of C&S RRd, have been allowed more than you offer us," and, again, that you are not advised that the statement of affairs asked of you is not asked of others. Your favor of the 5th announces Mr C. O. Sanford as your authority for making these remarks to which I objected.
   The Virginia roads labor under many disadvantages which yours did not, particularly in cost of wood, provisions & negro labor, and when Mr Sanford asked for an increase he based his demand upon the ??? disadvantages under which he labored by reason of the high prices of the materials above named and also because his road was cut by the enemy and a portion of it held by them.
   I do not think either you or Mr Sanford could find any parallels between the PRRd and the C&SRRd Co in November last, and I hope you will ???, and I hope you will, with this explanation, ??? ??? from the charges you have uttered that would ??? ??? of which do not labor under the same advantages with yours, have been allowed more than ?????.
   As to your second charge that similar statements to his required of you and not required of others I have to reply that I have laying on my desk, this instant, a statement made out by Mr Sanford in his own handwriting showing the operations of the Petersburg RRd for the eight previous months to the date of his application of a increased compensation.
   I cannot imagine why Mr Sanford should have given me such information as you claim from him, and must believe that it arose from some misunderstanding.
   I am ready to advance your rates when you do as all others have done when rates have been increased, viz satisfy me by an exhibition of the operating of your road that your demand is a just one. You surely must not have me increase the tariff of any railroad blindly.
   It rests with you of course whether this statement asked for shall be granted, but let me ask you what would an impartial observer think of your refusal to submit it? Could he favor any other consideration than that your road was so prosperous it was not entitled to an advancement. You publish this information every year and it is therefore not prying into your secrets.
   In conclusion permit me to assure you of my anxiety to be equally just to all and I see no way to observe this rule but in adhering to the plans already adopted.
Very respy
F. W. Sims
Lt Col &c

Home