NA, QM 4/8/1862

Quartermaster General's Department
Richmond, 8th Apl 1862
 
Charles Ellis Esq
Prest Rich & Petbg R Road  {Richmond & Petersburg RR}
Richmond Va
 
Sir,
   I have considered the  contents of your letter of the 29th ult respecting certain deductions made by Lt Col Smith in settling the transportation account of the Richmond & Petersburg Rail Road arising from the loss of public supplies coming to this point.
   Your object to the justice of his action on the ground that many of the deductions occurred prior to the adoption of the Chattanooga rates and 2 that the losses are not traced to your company to the exclusion of others.
   I have never considered that the clause inserted in my offer to the various rail road companies varied their responsibility as common carriers. It was but in the nature of a notice or recognition of these pre-existing liabilities. In regard to the second objection I think that the understanding prevailing among the companies disposes of that.
   The companies act in concert and to a certain extent are the insurers of each other.
   In one of these resolves they determined that losses should be settled by the company at the terminal point; to be charged by it to the road in which the loss actually occurred, if that could be ascertained, otherwise to be distributed along the whole line in proportion to the freight received by each road.
   Your company as the terminus one would seem to have its remedy against the others, and the Government be justified in making the deductions, in the manner it has, without instituting inquiries to ascertain at what particular point the loss occurred.
   Your company can insist, should you deem that course advisable, that the Quarter Master or Commissary shall ascertain the fact of loss before the supplies leave your Depot or the custody of your agents.
A. C. Myers
Q. M. Genl.

Home